Zum Inhalt springen

Aktualisiert vor 52 SekundenQuellen:LiveBench Agentic Coding

/ Live Benchmarks / Agentic Coding

Agentic-Coding-Benchmarks

Mehrstufige Code-Bearbeitung und Tool-Nutzung — agentische Workflows aus LiveBench.

LiveBench Agentic Coding

Originalquelle ansehen →
#ModelScore
1
GLM 5.2Z.AI
73.3%
2
GPT-5.4 Thinking xHigh EffortOpenAI
70.0%
3
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
70.0%
4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview HighGoogle
65.0%
5
Claude Sonnet 5 xHigh EffortAnthropic
65.0%
6
Claude 4.5 Opus Thinking High EffortAnthropic
63.3%
7
Claude 4.5 Opus Medium EffortAnthropic
63.3%
8
Claude 4.6 Opus Thinking High EffortAnthropic
61.7%
9
Claude 4.8 Opus Thinking xHigh EffortAnthropic
60.0%
10
Claude Fable 5 Thinking xHigh Effort*losing out due to stricter content moderationAnthropic
60.0%
11
Claude 4.7 Opus Thinking xHigh EffortAnthropic
60.0%
12
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Thinking Medium EffortAnthropic
60.0%
13
Minimax M3MiniMax
60.0%
14
Kimi K2.6 ThinkingMoonshot AI
58.3%
15
GPT-5.5 Thinking xHigh EffortOpenAI
56.7%
16
DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
56.7%
17
Gemini 3 Pro Preview HighGoogle
55.0%
18
GPT-5.3 Codex HighOpenAI
55.0%
19
Qwen 3.6 PlusAlibaba
55.0%
20
GLM 5.1Z.AI
55.0%
21
GLM 5Z.AI
55.0%
22
GPT-5.1 Codex Max HighOpenAI
53.3%
23
GPT-5.1 HighOpenAI
53.3%
24
Grok Build 0.1xAI
53.3%
25
GPT-5.1 CodexOpenAI
53.3%
26
Claude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic
53.3%
27
Claude 4.1 OpusAnthropic
53.3%
28
Gemini 3.5 Flash HighGoogle
51.7%
29
GPT-5.2 HighOpenAI
51.7%
30
GPT-5.2 CodexOpenAI
51.7%
31
Qwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba
51.7%
32
GPT-5 ProOpenAI
51.7%
33
Minimax M2.5MiniMax
51.7%
34
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
50.0%
35
Grok 4.3xAI
50.0%
36
Qwen 3.6 27BAlibaba
50.0%
37
Minimax M2.7MiniMax
50.0%
38
GPT-5.4 Nano xHighOpenAI
49.1%
39
Kimi K2.5 ThinkingMoonshot AI
48.3%
40
Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingAnthropic
48.3%
41
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
48.3%
42
GPT-5.4 Mini xHighOpenAI
47.5%
43
GPT-5 Mini HighOpenAI
46.7%
44
Qwen 3.6 FlashAlibaba
46.7%
45
DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek
46.7%
46
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA
46.7%
47
Grok 4.20 BetaxAI
43.3%
48
Devstral 2Mistral
43.3%
49
Claude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic
41.7%
50
GLM 4.7Z.AI
41.7%
51
Gemini 3 Flash Preview HighGoogle
40.0%
52
DeepSeek V3.2 ThinkingDeepSeek
40.0%
53
Gemma 4 31BGoogle
40.0%
54
Claude 4 Sonnet ThinkingAnthropic
40.0%
55
GPT-5.1 Codex MiniOpenAI
40.0%
56
GPT-5.2 No ThinkingOpenAI
40.0%
57
Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
38.3%
58
Claude 4 SonnetAnthropic
38.3%
59
Grok 4.20 Beta (Non-Reasoning)xAI
38.3%
60
DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
36.7%
61
GLM 4.6Z.AI
35.0%
62
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview HighGoogle
33.3%
63
Gemini 2.5 Pro (Max Thinking)Google
33.3%
64
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
33.3%
65
Grok Code FastxAI
33.3%
66
Grok 4.1 FastxAI
31.7%
67
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp ThinkingDeepSeek
31.7%
68
Kimi K2 InstructMoonshot AI
31.7%
69
Grok 4xAI
30.0%
70
MiMo V2 ProXiaomi
30.0%
71
GPT-5.3 InstantOpenAI
28.3%
72
GPT-5.1 No ThinkingOpenAI
28.3%
73
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Max Thinking) (2025-09-25)Google
23.3%
74
GPT-5 Nano HighOpenAI
23.3%
75
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA
23.0%
76
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Max Thinking) (2025-06-05)Google
16.7%
77
GPT OSS 120bOpenAI
16.7%
78
Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Alibaba
13.3%
79
Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B InstructAlibaba
10.0%
80
Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-Reasoning)xAI
10.0%
81
Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingAlibaba
8.3%
82
Qwen 3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Alibaba
6.7%
83
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (Max Thinking) (2025-06-17)Google
5.0%
84
GLM 5V TurboZ.AI
3.3%
85
Qwen 3 32BAlibaba
3.3%
86
GLM 4.6VZ.AI
3.3%
87
Trinity Large PreviewArcee AI
3.3%
88
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (Max Thinking) (2025-09-25)Google
1.7%
89
Qwen 3 30B A3BAlibaba
1.7%
90
Elephant AlphaOpenRouter
1.7%

/ Live Benchmarks

Brauchen Sie Hilfe bei der Auswahl des richtigen KI-Modells?

Benchmarks sind ein Ausgangspunkt, keine Antwort. Das richtige Modell hängt von Ihrem Workload, Budget und Ihren Integrations-Anforderungen ab – lassen Sie es uns gemeinsam herausfinden.