/ LLM benchmarks / Agentic Coding
Agentic coding benchmarks
Multi-step code editing and tool use in agentic workflows, from LiveBench.
DataLiveBenchrelease 2026-06-25fetched
LiveBench Agentic Coding · CC BY-SA 4.0
View original source| # | Model | Score | Cost/solved task |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Max EffortDeepSeek · open weights | 77.3% | $0.029 |
| 2 | Claude 5.5 Opus Thinking Max EffortAnthropic | 71.7% | $0.80 |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.1 Max EffortAnthropic | 66.1% | $1.21 |
| 4 | Claude 5 Opus Thinking Max EffortAnthropic | 65.2% | $0.70 |
| 5 | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek · open weights | 65.1% | $0.051 |
| 6 | Qwen 3.8 MaxAlibaba · open weights | 64.6% | $0.28 |
| 7 | Muse Spark 1.3 xHigh EffortMeta | 64.1% | $0.22 |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5 Max EffortAnthropic | 62.2% | $1.44 |
| 9 | Kimi K3Moonshot AI · open weights | 62.2% | $0.35 |
| 10 | Qwen 3.8 Flash NextAlibaba · open weights | 61.6% | $0.042 |
| 11 | Qwen3.8 27BAlibaba · open weights | 61.4% | $0.094 |
| 12 | GLM-5.3Z.AI · open weights | 60.9% | $0.45 |
| 13 | Claude Sonnet 5 xHigh EffortAnthropic | 59.4% | $0.51 |
| 14 | Muse Spark 1.1 xHigh EffortMeta | 58.5% | $0.20 |
| 15 | Gemini 3.7 Flash HighGoogle | 58.3% | $0.16 |
| 16 | Muse Spark 1.2 xHigh EffortMeta | 57.6% | $0.38 |
| 17 | GPT-6 Astra Max EffortOpenAI | 57.3% | $0.74 |
| 18 | Grok 4.6 xHighxAI | 57.0% | $0.21 |
| 19 | GLM-5.3 FlashZ.AI · open weights | 56.8% | $0.031 |
| 20 | Grok 4.5xAI | 56.5% | $0.13 |
| 21 | GPT-5.6 Sol Max EffortOpenAI | 56.2% | $0.52 |
| 22 | GPT-5.6 Terra Max EffortOpenAI | 54.9% | $0.35 |
| 23 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek · open weights | 54.9% | $0.044 |
| 24 | GPT-6.1 Sol Max EffortOpenAI | 54.5% | $0.14 |
| 25 | Gemini 3.8 Flash HighGoogle | 54.2% | $0.31 |
| 26 | GPT-5.5 Thinking xHigh EffortOpenAI | 54.0% | $0.43 |
| 27 | Grok 4.7 xHighxAI | 54.0% | $0.72 |
| 28 | GPT-5.4 Thinking xHigh EffortOpenAI | 53.8% | $0.39 |
| 29 | GPT-6 Sol Max EffortOpenAI | 52.9% | $0.27 |
| 30 | Ox Alpha MaxStealth | 52.6% | – |
| 31 | GLM-5.2Z.AI · open weights | 51.8% | $0.23 |
| 32 | GPT-6 Luna Max EffortOpenAI | 51.2% | $0.026 |
| 33 | Claude 4.7 Opus Thinking xHigh EffortAnthropic | 50.7% | $0.53 |
| 34 | Claude 4.8 Opus Thinking Max EffortAnthropic | 50.5% | $0.98 |
| 35 | GPT-5.2 HighOpenAI | 50.3% | $0.23 |
| 36 | GPT-5.2 CodexOpenAI | 49.4% | $0.19 |
| 37 | Inkling xHigh EffortThinking Machines · open weights | 49.4% | $0.31 |
| 38 | Gemini 3.5 Flash HighGoogle | 49.0% | $0.25 |
| 39 | Claude 4.6 Opus Thinking High EffortAnthropic | 49.0% | $0.40 |
| 40 | GPT-5.6 Luna Max EffortOpenAI | 48.4% | $0.17 |
| 41 | Kimi K2.6 ThinkingMoonshot AI · open weights | 46.9% | $0.17 |
| 42 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek · open weights | 46.8% | $0.060 |
| 43 | GPT-5.4 Nano xHighOpenAI | 46.8% | $0.091 |
| 44 | Grok Build 0.1xAI | 45.8% | $0.024 |
| 45 | Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · open weights | 45.7% | $0.10 |
| 46 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite HighGoogle | 45.3% | $0.069 |
| 47 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview HighGoogle | 44.1% | $0.29 |
| 48 | Qwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba | 43.6% | $0.18 |
| 49 | Gemini 3.6 Flash HighGoogle | 43.4% | $0.23 |
| 50 | Claude 4.6 Sonnet Thinking Medium EffortAnthropic | 42.6% | $0.31 |
| 51 | GPT-5.4 Mini xHighOpenAI | 41.7% | $0.33 |
| 52 | Qwen 3.6 PlusAlibaba | 41.4% | $0.23 |
| 53 | Minimax M3MiniMax | 40.7% | $0.060 |
| 54 | Claude 4.5 Opus Thinking High EffortAnthropic | 39.7% | $0.61 |
| 55 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 xHigh EffortAnthropic | 39.3% | $0.14 |
| 56 | Qwen 3.6 27BAlibaba · open weights | 39.3% | $0.20 |
| 57 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA · open weights | 38.7% | $0.37 |
| 58 | Grok 4.3xAI | 18.5% | $0.061 |
Need a model picked for your use case?
Benchmarks rank models on other people's tasks. For a business workflow I test the shortlist on your own data, costs and privacy requirements, and recommend one.