Updated 53 seconds agoSources:LiveBench Data Analysis
/ Live Benchmarks / Data Analysis
Data analysis benchmarks
Structured data interpretation, querying, and analysis from LiveBench.
LiveBench Data Analysis
View original source →| # | Model | Score | Input $/M | Output $/M | Context | CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.5 Thinking xHigh EffortOpenAI | 81.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5 Thinking xHigh Effort*losing out due to stricter content moderationAnthropic | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | GPT-5.4 Thinking xHigh EffortOpenAI | 79.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview HighGoogle | 78.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | Claude 4.8 Opus Thinking xHigh EffortAnthropic | 78.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | Claude 4.7 Opus Thinking xHigh EffortAnthropic | 78.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | GPT-5.2 CodexOpenAI | 78.2% | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | GPT-5.2 HighOpenAI | 78.2% | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Claude 4.6 Sonnet Thinking Medium EffortAnthropic | 78.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Minimax M3MiniMax | 76.2% | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview HighGoogle | 74.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek | 74.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | Claude 4.5 Opus Thinking High EffortAnthropic | 74.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview HighGoogle | 74.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | GLM 5.2Z.AI | 73.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | Claude Sonnet 5 xHigh EffortAnthropic | 72.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | Qwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba | 71.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | GPT-5.4 Mini xHighOpenAI | 71.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | Grok Build 0.1xAI | 70.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | Qwen 3.6 27BAlibaba | 70.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | GPT-5.1 Codex Max HighOpenAI | 70.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | Qwen 3.6 PlusAlibaba | 69.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | Claude 4.6 Opus Thinking High EffortAnthropic | 69.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | GPT-5.1 HighOpenAI | 69.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek | 68.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | GLM 5Z.AI | 67.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | GPT-5.4 Nano xHighOpenAI | 67.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | Kimi K2.6 ThinkingMoonshot AI | 65.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | Gemini 3.5 Flash HighGoogle | 64.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | Grok 4xAI | 63.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | GLM 5.1Z.AI | 63.2% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Grok 4.20 BetaxAI | 62.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | GPT-5.3 Codex HighOpenAI | 62.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | 62.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | Kimi K2.5 ThinkingMoonshot AI | 61.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | Gemini 2.5 Flash (Max Thinking) (2025-09-25)Google | 61.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | GPT-5.1 CodexOpenAI | 60.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | Claude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic | 59.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | Qwen 3.6 FlashAlibaba | 58.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | Gemma 4 31BGoogle | 58.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | GPT-5 ProOpenAI | 57.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic | 57.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | Minimax M2.7MiniMax | 56.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Grok 4.3xAI | 55.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 45 | GPT-5 Mini HighOpenAI | 55.2% | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | GLM 4.7Z.AI | 55.2% | — | — | — | — |
| 47 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview HighGoogle | 54.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 48 | Claude 4 Sonnet ThinkingAnthropic | 54.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 49 | GLM 5V TurboZ.AI | 54.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 50 | Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingAlibaba | 53.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 51 | Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI | 52.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 52 | Grok 4.1 FastxAI | 52.2% | — | — | — | — |
| 53 | Qwen 3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Alibaba | 52.2% | — | — | — | — |
| 54 | GLM 4.6Z.AI | 52.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 55 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (Max Thinking)Google | 51.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 56 | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp ThinkingDeepSeek | 51.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 57 | DeepSeek V3.2 ThinkingDeepSeek | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 58 | Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B InstructAlibaba | 49.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 59 | GPT-5.1 Codex MiniOpenAI | 49.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 60 | Minimax M2.5MiniMax | 49.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 61 | MiMo V2 ProXiaomi | 49.2% | — | — | — | — |
| 62 | Grok Code FastxAI | 49.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 63 | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingAnthropic | 49.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 64 | GPT-5.3 InstantOpenAI | 48.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 65 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (Max Thinking) (2025-09-25)Google | 47.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 66 | GPT-5.2 No ThinkingOpenAI | 47.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 67 | Gemini 2.5 Flash (Max Thinking) (2025-06-05)Google | 47.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 68 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (Max Thinking) (2025-06-17)Google | 47.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 69 | Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | 47.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 70 | Qwen 3 32BAlibaba | 46.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 71 | GLM 4.6VZ.AI | 46.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 72 | Claude 4.5 Opus Medium EffortAnthropic | 45.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 73 | Claude 4.1 OpusAnthropic | 45.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 74 | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | 45.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 75 | DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek | 45.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 76 | Qwen 3 30B A3BAlibaba | 44.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 77 | Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Alibaba | 44.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 78 | DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek | 44.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 79 | Claude 4 SonnetAnthropic | 44.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | GPT-5.1 No ThinkingOpenAI | 44.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Grok 4.20 Beta (Non-Reasoning)xAI | 43.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | GPT-5 Nano HighOpenAI | 43.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 83 | Kimi K2 InstructMoonshot AI | 43.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA | 42.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-Reasoning)xAI | 40.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Trinity Large PreviewArcee AI | 40.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Devstral 2Mistral | 39.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | GPT OSS 120bOpenAI | 38.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Elephant AlphaOpenRouter | 38.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 90 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA | 21.2% | — | — | — | — |
/ Live Benchmarks
Need help choosing the right AI model for your business?
Benchmarks are a starting point, not an answer. The right model depends on your workload, budget, and integration constraints — let's figure it out together.